Here's a scoring summary: red shows CRU; blue shows MBH and students; green shows Lamont-Doherty and WSL-Birmensdorff. I've listed multiproxy studies here which made their way into spaghetti diagrams (plus Jacoby for reasons that readers will understand.) If you go a little further and add studies which are slightly narrower, the overlaps become even more apparent.
| 1 | Jacoby (d'Arrigo) | Climatic Change 1989. |
| 2 | Bradley (Jones) | Holocene 1993 |
| 3 | Hughes (Bradley, Diaz) | Climatic Change 1994 |
| 4 | Mann (Bradley, Hughes) | Nature 1998, GRL 1999 |
| 5 | Jones (Briffa, Barnett, Tett) | Holocene 1998 |
| 6 | Briffa (Jones, Schweingruber, Osborn) | Nature 1998 (MXD) - see also 8, 10 |
| 7 | Briffa (Osborn) | Science 1999 (RW) |
| 8 | Briffa | QSR 2000 (RW, MXD Figure 5: compare 6, 10) |
| 9 | Crowley (Lowery) [data from Jones] | Ambio 2000 |
| 10 | Briffa (Osborn, Schweingruber, Harris, Jones, Shiyatov, Vaganov) | JGR 2001 (MXD: compare 6, 8) |
| 11 | Esper (Cook, Schweingruber) | Science 2002 |
| 12 | Mann (Jones) | GRL 2003 |
| 13 | Rutherford (Mann, Bradley, Hughes, Jones, Briffa, Osborn) | J Clim. 2005 |
I thought it would be fun to think up lines for the hockey team. I've toyed with different ideas. Do you put the grizzled veterans - say, Jacoby and Hughes - on defence. Or do you keep the main lines together - Mann, Bradley and Hughes on one line; Jones, Briffa and Osborn on another? How do you work in the "rookie", Rutherford? Who plays goal? Do you make up a tree ring line? I'm a little worried about their skating skills. It looks like Mann can skate backwards, but what about Hughes?
What should the team be called: the Kyoto Flames? the Blades? the Heat? So many decisions, so little time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
